The coupled-cluster package in Q-Chem can calculate properties of target EOM states including permanent dipoles, angular momentum projections, static polarizabilities, $\u27e8{S}^{2}\u27e9$ and $\u27e8{R}^{2}\u27e9$ values, g-tensors (CCSD only), nuclear gradients (and geometry optimizations). The target state of interest is selected by CC_STATE_TO_OPT $rem, which specifies the symmetry and the number of the EOM state. In addition to state properties, calculations of various interstate properties are available (transition dipoles, angular momentum matrix elements, two-photon absorption transition moments (and cross-sections), spin-orbit couplings, electronic circular dichroism (ECD) rotatory strengths).
Analytic gradients are available for the CCSD and all EOM-CCSD methods for
both closed- and open-shell references (UHF and RHF only), including frozen
core/virtual functionality
^{
670
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2005),
122,
pp. 224106.
Link
and RI/Cholesky representation of
the two-electron integrals (see also Section 6.15).
These calculations should be feasible whenever the corresponding single-point energy
calculation is feasible.
Note: Gradients for ROHF and non-HF (e.g., B3LYP) orbitals are not yet available.
Note: Gradients for EOM-DIP/DEA-CCSD are not yet available.
For the CCSD and EOM-CCSD wave functions, Q-Chem can calculate permanent and transition dipole moments, oscillator strengths, ECD rotatory strengths [both in length gauge (origin dependent) and in velocity gauge (origin independent)], $\u27e8{R}^{2}\u27e9$ (as well as XX, YY and ZZ components separately, which is useful for assigning different Rydberg states, e.g., $3{p}_{x}$ vs. $3s$, etc.), and the $\u27e8{S}^{2}\u27e9$ values. Calculation of g-tensors is available for CCSD wave functions (see Section 10.11.4 and example 10.11.4.4). Interface of the CCSD and EOM-CCSD codes with the NBO 5.0 package is also available. Furthermore, excited state analyses can be requested for EOM-CCSD excited states. For EOM-MP2, only state properties (dipole moments, angular momentum projections, $\u27e8{R}^{2}\u27e9$, $\u27e8{S}^{2}\u27e9$ are available). Similar functionality is available for some EOM-OD and CI models (CCMAN only).
Analysis of the real- and complex-valued EOM-CC wave functions can also be performed; see Sections 7.10.29 and 10.2.9. NTO analysis for EOM-IP/EA/SF states is, obviously, only available for the transitions between the EOM states, so CC_STATE_TO_OPT keyword needs to be used, as in calculations of transition properties.
Users must be aware of the point group symmetry of the system being studied and also the symmetry of the excited (target) state of interest. It is possible to turn off the use of symmetry using the CC_SYMMETRY. If set to FALSE the molecule will be treated as having ${C}_{1}$ symmetry and all states will be of $A$ symmetry.
Q-Chem allows flexible control of interstate properties calculations, by using CC_TRANS_PROP rem or rem section $trans_prop: the user can request the transitions between all computed EOM target states and the reference state (CC_TRANS_PROP = 1) or the calculations of all transition properties between all computed EOM target states (CC_TRANS_PROP = 2). By default, the reference state is the CCSD reference. To compute transition properties relative to a particular EOM state, use CC_STATE_TO_OPT.
By default, only one-electron properties are computed. To activate calculations of two-electron properties, such as NACs, SOCs, 2PA, additional keywords should be activated, as described below.
The $trans_prop input section allows the user to specify precisely which properties and for which pairs of states to computed. When the $trans_prop section is present in the input, it overrides the setting of the CC_TRANS_PROP $rem variable. However, for $trans_prop to work, CC_TRANS_PROP does need to be set.
$trans_prop state_list ! Start a list of states ee_singlets 1 1 ! state 1: EE singlet with irrep = 1 and istate = 1 ee_triplets 1 2 ! state 2: EE triplet with irrep = 1 and istate = 2 ref ! state 3: Reference state (can be CC or MP2, but the latter NYI ! in transition prop driver) end_list ! End list state_pair_list ! Start to specify pairs of states, 3 1 ! transition from state 3 to state 1 (known bug here: CC state ! needs to be 1st one) 3 2 ! transition from state 3 to state 2 (known bug here: CC state ! needs to be 1st one) end_pairs ! End list of pairs calc nac ! Compute NAC for all transition pairs listed before this keyword state_list ! Start another list of states (user is able to request multiple ! state lists for multiple tasks) ref ! reference state ee_singlets 0 0 ! zero means all requested irreps/istate in $rem end_list calc dipole soc ! Compute transition dipole and SOC calc opdm_norm ! Compute norm of transition OPDM $end
Notes about the $trans_prop input section:
calc
computes properties for the first pair list (or state
list) before it.
The pair list is optional: if there is no pair list, all possible combinations within the state list will be considered.
Options after calc
include: nac
, soc
, dyson
,
2pa
, dipole
, default
, pcm
, opdm_norm
,
wfa
, ang
. Currently, only some of them are implemented.
Note: The $trans_prop section is a new feature and is still under development — use at your own risk. Eventually, this section will replace other controls and will become a default.
Calculation of transition moments and cross-sections for two-photon absorption
for EOM-EE-CCSD wave functions is available in Q-Chem (CCMAN2 only). Both
CCSD-EOM and EOM-EOM transitions can be computed. The formalism is described in
Ref.
806
J. Chem. Phys.
(2015),
142,
pp. 064118.
Link
. This feature is available both for canonical and
RI/CD implementations. The undamped canonical 2PA cross sections between EOM-DEA-CCSD states
are also available. Relevant keywords are CC_EOM_2PA (turns on
the calculation, controls NTO calculation), CC_STATE_TO_OPT (used
for EOM-EOM transitions); additional customization can be performed using the
$2pa section. The quantity printed out is the microscopic cross-section
${\delta}^{TPA}$ (also known as rotationally averaged 2PA strength), as defined
in Eq. (30) of Ref.
806
J. Chem. Phys.
(2015),
142,
pp. 064118.
Link
.
The $2pa section is used to specify the range of frequency-pairs satisfying the resonance condition. If $2pa section is absent in the input, the transition moments are computed for 2 degenerate photons with total energy matching the excitation energy of each target EOM state (for CCSD-EOM) or each EOM-EOM energy difference (for EOM-EOM transitions): $2h\nu ={E}_{ex}$ For resonant or near-resonant calculations (i.e., when one of the photons is in resonance with an excited state), damped response theory should be used; such calculations are deployed by adding DAMPED_EPSILON in the $2pa section (the value of $\u03f5$ is specified in hartrees, 0.001 is usually sufficient).
$2pa Non-degenerate resonant 2PA N_2PA_POINTS 6 Number of frequency pairs OMEGA_1 500000 10000 Scans 500 cm$^{-1}$ to 550 cm$^{-1}$ in steps of 10 cm$^{-1}$ $end
N_2PA_POINTS is the number of frequency pairs across the spectrum. The first value associated with OMEGA_1 is the frequency $\times 1000$ in cm${}^{-1}$ at the start of the spectrum and the second value is the step size $\times 1000$ in cm${}^{-1}$. The frequency of the second photon at each step is determined within the code as the excitation energy minus OMEGA_1.
To gain insight into computed cross sections for 2PA, one can perform NTO
analysis of the response one-particle density matrices
^{
807
}
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
(2017),
8,
pp. 3256.
Link
. To
activate NTO analysis of the 2PA response one-particle transition density
matrices, set STATE_ANALYSIS = TRUE, MOLDEN_FORMAT
= TRUE (to export the orbitals as MolDen files),
NTO_PAIRS (specifies the number of orbitals to print). The NTO
analysis will be performed for the full 2PA response one-particle transition
density matrices as well as the normalized $\omega $DMs (see
Ref.
807
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
(2017),
8,
pp. 3256.
Link
for more details).
Calculations of spin–orbit couplings (SOCs) for EOM-CC wave functions is
available in CCMAN2
^{
302
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2015),
143,
pp. 064102.
Link
^{,}
^{
905
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2019),
151,
pp. 034106.
Link
. We employ a perturbative approach
in which SOCs are computed as matrix elements of the respective part of the
Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian using zero-order non-relativistic wave functions.
There are two versions of the code that can be engaged by using
CALC_SOC. The old code computes SOC as a matrix element between a
pair of states that need to be explicitly computed; thus, it is able to produce
only one matrix element per transition. Although this approach can be used to
extract the whole matrix through rotations of the
molecule
^{
909
}
J. Phys. Chem. A
(2019),
123,
pp. 482.
Link
, the relative phases of these matrix elements are
lost. The new version of the code solves this issue and also improves
performance
^{
905
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2019),
151,
pp. 034106.
Link
. The new code actively uses
Wigner–Eckart’s theorem to compute the entire spin–orbit matrix. We
partition excitation operators by their spin properties. Since the spin–orbit
operator is a triplet operator, we can consider the following triplet
excitation operators
${T}_{p,q}^{1,1}=-{a}_{p\alpha}^{\u2020}{a}_{q\beta}$ | (7.65) | ||
${T}_{p,q}^{1,0}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}}\left({a}_{p\alpha}^{\u2020}{a}_{q\alpha}-{a}_{p\beta}^{\u2020}{a}_{q\beta}\right)$ | (7.66) | ||
${T}_{p,q}^{1,-1}={a}_{p\beta}^{\u2020}{a}_{q\alpha}$ | (7.67) |
If we apply Wigner–Eckart’s theorem, the following matrix elements are decomposed into the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients and reduced matrix elements:
$$\u27e8{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}SM|{T}_{p,q}^{1,k}|{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}{S}^{\prime}{M}^{\prime}\u27e9=\u27e8{S}^{\prime}{M}^{\prime}|1k|SM\u27e9\u27e8{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}S||{T}_{p,q}^{1,\cdot}||{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}{S}^{\prime}\u27e9,$$ | (7.68) |
where $S$ and ${S}^{\prime}$ denote spins, and $M$ and ${M}^{\prime}$ denote spin projections of ${\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}$ and ${\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}$, respectively. The reduced matrix elements form a new, spinless triplet transition density matrix, which we will denote as ${u}^{1,\cdot}$. The spin–orbit reduced matrix elements are obtained as a trace with ${u}^{1,\cdot}$:
$\u27e8{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}S||{H}_{{L}_{-}}||{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}{S}^{\prime}\u27e9=-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}{\displaystyle \sum _{p,q}}{h}_{{L}_{-};p,q}^{SO}{u}_{p,q}^{1,\cdot}$ | (7.69) | ||
$\u27e8{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}S||{H}_{{L}_{0}}||{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}{S}^{\prime}\u27e9={\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}}{\displaystyle \sum _{p,q}}{h}_{{L}_{z};p,q}^{SO}{u}_{p,q}^{1,\cdot}$ | (7.70) | ||
$\u27e8{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}S||{H}_{{L}_{+}}||{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}{S}^{\prime}\u27e9=+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}{\displaystyle \sum _{p,q}}{h}_{{L}_{+};p,q}^{SO}{u}_{p,q}^{1,\cdot},$ | (7.71) |
Applying Wigner–Eckart’s theorem again, all possible matrix elements are generated from reduced matrix elements. This algorithm is available for the EOM-EE/SF/IP/EA wave functions for MP2 and CCSD references, as well as between the CCSD reference and EOM-EE/SF.
A(Ket)->B(Bra) transition SO matrices Analyzing Sz ans S^2 of the pair of states... Ket state: Computed S^2 = 2.019877 will be treated as 2.000000 Sz = 0.000000 Bra state: Computed S^2 = 0.019216 will be treated as 0.000000 Sz = 0.000000 Clebsch-Gordan coefficient: <1.000,0.000;1.000,0.000|0.000,0.000> = 0.577 One-electron SO (cm-1) Reduced matrix elements: <S|| Hso(L-) ||S’> = (-2.660965,-22.180075) <S|| Hso(L0) ||S’> = (0.000000,-20.019517) <S|| Hso(L+) ||S’> = (-2.660965,22.180075) SOCC = 21.593626 Actual matrix elements: |Sz=-1.00> |Sz=0.00> |Sz=1.00> <Sz=0.00|(1.536309,12.805673)(0.000000,-11.558274)(1.536309,-12.805673) Mean-field SO (cm-1) Reduced matrix elements: <S|| Hso(L-) ||S’> = (-2.069801,-9.910572) <S|| Hso(L0) ||S’> = (0.000000,-10.692261) <S|| Hso(L+) ||S’> = (-2.005570,9.957712) Singlet part of <S|| Hso(L0) ||S’> = (-0.000000,0.037101) (excluded from all matrix elements) L-/L+ Averaged reduced matrix elements: <S|| Hso(L-) ||S’> = (-2.037685,-9.934142) <S|| Hso(L+) ||S’> = (-2.037685,9.934142) SOCC = 10.328006 Actual matrix elements: |Sz=-1.00> |Sz=0.00> |Sz=1.00> <Sz=0.00|(1.176458,5.735480)(0.000000,-6.173180)(1.176458,-5.735480)
The algorithm is activated by setting CALC_SOC to 1 or 2. The execution relies on a non-zero Clebsch–Gordan coefficient (otherwise, it is not possible to extract the necessary information from the transition density matrix). If the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient is zero, a warning will be printed, and the transition will be skipped. Usually it is possible to select the states, leading to non-zero Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, by selecting SF or EE, alpha or beta electrons in case of EA or IP. Determination of state multiplicities is based on ${S}^{2}$. In case of a strong spin contamination, a warning is printed, and the closest multiplicity is assumed.
In the case of open-shell references, the resulting reduced matrix elements may violate symmetries implied by the spin–orbit operator. Setting CALC_SOC to 1 will produce these reduced matrix elements, but the actual spin–orbit matrix will be produced from the averaged reduced matrix elements, in which the desired symmetry is restored. Setting CALC_SOC to 2 will form spin–orbit matrix without averaging of reduced matrix elements. Although in practice the difference between these two options is small, the averaging may simplify the analysis of splittings. Examples 7.10.22.1 and 7.10.22.1 illustrate calculation of SOC using SOMF in the acetylene-O complex.
Note: In the case of ECP, attempts to compute SOCs using the above algorithms (with CALC_SOC=1 or 2) will, most likely, result in unphysically low SOC values. Instead, we recommend using effective charges (CALC_SOC=4).
To activate the NTO analysis of the spinless one-particle transition density matrices
^{
907
}
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
(2019),
10,
pp. 4857–4862.
Link
and to compute spin–orbit integrals over NTOs,
set STATE_ANALYSIS = TRUE , MOLDEN_FORMAT = TRUE,
in addition to CALC_SOC = 1, 2, or 4.
Q-Chem also affords computing SOCs using one-electron SO operator with
effective nuclear charges
^{
316
}
Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.
(2003),
22,
pp. 551.
Link
.
The rational for this approach is that the effect of the
mean-field two-electron part of the SOC operator
can be approximated by screened nuclear charges.
In the case of all-electron calculations (no ECP), this approach is less rigorous than SOMF,
but it does not use two-electron integrals at all and is, therefore, less expensive.
Moreover, using effective charges allows one to obtain reasonable values of SOCs with ECPs.
This calculation is activated by using CALC_SOC=4. Q-Chem output will contain
one-electron SOCs computed with the original and screened (effective) nuclear charges.
In the case of open-shell references, SOCs are computed using ${L}_{+}/{L}_{-}$ averaging (as
for the CALC_SOC=1 case). By default, the calculations use effective
charges from Fedorov et al
^{
316
}
Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.
(2003),
22,
pp. 551.
Link
(tabulated for lithium through
astatine, except lanthanides): for all-electron calculations,
the effective charges from the 6-31G basis are used, and for ECPs, SBKJC charges are used.
Alternatively, the user can provide user-defined effective charges via input section
$soc_eff_charges, as follows:
$soc_eff_charges 8.0 6.0 !use eff. charge=6 for oxygen (Z=8) 17.0 11.0 !use eff. charge=11 for chlorine (Z=17) $end
Examples 7.10.22.1 and 7.10.22.1 illustrate this capability.
The legacy code has the full two-electron treatment and the mean-field approximation. To enable the SOC calculation, transition properties between EOM states must be enabled via CC_TRANS_PROP, and SOC requested setting CALC_SOC to 3. By default, one-electron and mean-field two-electron couplings will be computed. Full two-electron coupling calculation is activated by setting CC_EOM_PROP_TE.
As with other EOM transition properties, the initial EOM state is set by CC_STATE_TO_OPT, and couplings are computed between that state and all other EOM states. In the absence of CC_STATE_TO_OPT, SOCs are computed between the reference state and all EOM-EE or EOM-SF states.
Note: In a spin-restricted case, such as EOM-EE calculations using closed-shell reference state, SOCs between the singlet and triplet EOM manifolds cannot be computed (only SOCs between the reference state and EOM triplets can be calculated). To compute SOCs between EOM-EE singlets and EOM-EE triplets, run the same job with UNRESTRICTED = TRUE, such that triplets and singlets appear in the same manifold.
Note: The most flexible control for computing transition properties is afforded by $trans_prop input section, as described in Section 7.10.21.
Calculations of nonadiabatic (derivative) couplings (NACs) for EOM-CC wave functions is
available in CCMAN2. We employ Szalay’s approach in which couplings are computed
by a modified analytic gradient code, via “summed states”:
^{
1106
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2009),
131,
pp. 124104.
Link
$${h}_{IJ}^{x}\equiv \u27e8{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}|{H}^{x}|{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}\u27e9=\frac{1}{2}\left({G}_{(I+J)}-{G}_{I}-{G}_{J}\right),$$ | (7.72) |
where, ${G}_{I}$, ${G}_{J}$, and ${G}_{IJ}$ are analytic gradients for states $I$, $J$,
and a fictitious summed state $|{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I+J}\u27e9\equiv |{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{I}\u27e9+|{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{J}\u27e9$. Currently, NACs for EE/IP/EA are available.
^{
312
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2018),
148,
pp. 044103.
Link
Note: Note that the individual components of the NAC vector depend on the molecular orientation.
Calculation of the static and dynamical dipole polarizabilities for CCSD and EOM-EE/SF
wave functions is available in CCMAN2. Polarizabilities are calculated as
second derivatives of the CCSD or EOM-CCSD energy
^{
811
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2016),
145,
pp. 204116.
Link
as well as
using the expectation-value approach, i.e., the sum-over-states expression for
the exact wave function
^{
805
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2018),
149,
pp. 141101.
Link
. In the analytic derivative approach
(or the response-theory formalism), only the response of the cluster amplitudes
is taken into the account; orbital relaxation is not included.
CC_FULLRESPONSE must be set to 2 to turn off the orbital
relaxation but allow amplitude response in EOM calculations, if the
polarizabilities are to be computed with this approach (both CC_POL
and EOM_POL must equal 1 or 2). CC_POL
and EOM_POL = 3 or 4 coupled with
CC_FULLRESPONSE = 0 will enable expectation-value
polarizabilities. Note that CC_REF_PROP and CC_EOM_PROP/
must be set to TRUE for these calculations.
Dynamical polarizabilities are enabled using the $dyn_pol section, which specifies the frequency range. Without this section, only the static polarizabilities will be computed. CCSD static and dynamical polarizabilities within the damped response theory are also available, which can be turned on by specifying the damped_epsilon variable in the $dyn_pol section.
$dyn_pol 500000 10000 6 !Scans 500 cm$^{-1}$ to 550 cm$^{-1}$ ! in steps of 10 cm$^{-1}$ damped_epsilon 10 !(Optional) Use for damped CCSD polarizabilities only. !Sets a damping factor of 10/1000 hartrees. $end
Currently, these features are available for the canonical implementation only.
Note: EOM-CCSD polarizabilities are available for the EE and SF wave functions only.
Calculation of the static and dynamical dipole first hyperpolarizabilities for CCSD
wave functions is available in CCMAN2 (currently, canonical implementation only).
First hyperpolarizabilities are computed within the damped-response expectation-value
approach
^{
809
}
J. Chem. Phys.
(2021),
154,
pp. 184109.
Link
.
Setting CC_1HPOL to 1 deploys the algorithm that
computes this property with the least number of response wave-function calculations.
Setting CC_1HPOL to 3, computes this property by constructing
the second-order response density matrices, which involves computing a
large number of second-order response wave functions. These second-order response
density matrices are then used to compute second-order response natural orbitals
using libwfa for quantitative wave-function and orbital analyses.
Calculations of first hyperpolarizabilities require the $1hpol section, which
specifies the frequency ranges of the two photons (${\omega}_{1}$ and ${\omega}_{2}$;
${\omega}_{3}={\omega}_{1}+{\omega}_{2}$),
as well as the corresponding damping factors.
Note: CC_FULLRESPONSE must be set to 0 and CC_REF_PROP must be set to TRUE for these calculations.
$1hpol omega_1 0000000 1500000 3 0.01 !Scans omega_1 from 0 cm$^{-1}$ to (3-1)*1500 cm$^{-1} ! in steps of 1500 cm$^{-1} ! damping factor epsilon_1 is 0.01 hartrees omega_2 0000000 2500000 4 0.01 !Scans omega_2 from 0 cm$^{-1}$ to (4-1)*2500 cm$^{-1} ! in steps of 2500 cm$^{-1} ! damping factor epsilon_2 is 0.01 hartrees omega_3 0.01 ! damping factor epsilon_3 is 0.01 hartrees $end
Example 7.10.22.1 computes static and dynamical first hyperpolarizability for CCSD/STO-3G wave function for LiH using the framework of damped response theory and the expectation-value approach. The property for the following set of 3 photons is calculated (frequencies in cm${}^{-1}$): (0, 0; 0), (2500, 0; -2500), (5000, 0; -5000), (0, 3500; -3500), (0, 7000; -7000), (2500, 3500; -6000), (2500, 7000; -9500), (5000, 3500; -8500), (5000, 7000; -12000).
Angular momentum matrix elements can be useful for analyzing wave functions, assigning state characters, or identifying term symmetry labels in linear molecules. As other one-electron properties, these matrix elements are evaluated using one-particle state and transition density matrices. Angular momentum is a gauge-dependent property, meaning that its value depends on the origin of the gauge. The gauge position can be controlled with $gauge_origin input section. The default position of the gauge corresponds to the $(0,0,0)$ of the coordinate system.
$gauge_origin Position of the gauge origin for 1.00 0.200 0.500 angular momentum calculations in angstroms. $end