X

Search Results

Searching....

7.9 Restricted Open-Shell and ΔSCF Methods

7.9.3 Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham Method (ROKS)

(April 13, 2024)

Singly-excited states of closed-shell molecules cannot be described via a single non-aufbau filled Slater determinant as both the up and down spins are equally likely to be excited, leading to at least two configurations with equal weights. Triplet energies can nonetheless be found from a single determinant by switching from the MS=0 subspace of the ground state to MS=±1 (i.e., by having both unpaired electrons have spins pointing in the same direction instead of having one up and one down spin). This tactic however does not work on singlet excited states, with non-aufbau filled configurations where only the up (or down) spin is excited being intermediate between singlet and triplet (and thus spin contaminated). This mixed state is not unlike spin-symmetry broken, unrestricted ground state solutions. An actual singlet energy can be obtained via approximate spin-purification post SCF, by removing the triplet contribution to the energy. The triplet energy thus has to be separately estimated with a second orbital optimization.

The restricted open-shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) method offers an alternative route to singlet excited states of this nature. The mixed non-aufbau configuration (with either the up or down spin being excited) is exactly halfway between a singlet and triplet when restricted open-shell orbitals are used, and has an energy Emix. The triplet energy ET is also computable from a single determinant within the the MS=±1 subspaces. Consequently, ROKS optimizes a set of spin-restricted orbitals {ϕROKS} such that the spin-purified singlet energy ES=2Emix[{ϕROKS}]-ET[{ϕROKS}] is stationary. This therefore needs only one orbital optimization, in contrast to the two sets needed for the ΔSCF approach mentioned in the preceding paragraph. The structure of the ROKS Fock matrix however is more complex, 645 Kowalczyk T. et al.
J. Chem. Phys.
(2013), 138, pp. 164101.
Link
by virtue of the two-determinant nature of the equations. It is also important to note that this excited-state method is distinct from ROKS theory for open-shell ground states, which is a single-determinant method corresponding to the high-spin state with multiple unpaired spins.

The implementation of ROKS excited states in Q-Chem largely follows the theoretical framework established by Filatov and Shaik; 344 Filatov M., Shaik S.
Chem. Phys. Lett.
(1999), 304, pp. 429.
Link
see Ref.  645 Kowalczyk T. et al.
J. Chem. Phys.
(2013), 138, pp. 164101.
Link
for the case of the lowest excited singlet (S1 state) with a DIIS-based approach. An example is provided below. ROKS for higher excited states is possible using either the squared-gradient approach (Section 7.9.4) or else state-targeted energy projection (Section 7.9.5).

ROKS has been found to be significantly more accurate than TDDFT for describing charge-transfer states, 453 Hait D. et al.
J. Chem. Theory Comput.
(2016), 12, pp. 3353.
Link
and preliminary evidence shows the same to hold for Rydberg states. ROKS is also extremely accurate for core excitation energies, with the SCAN functional yielding errors below 0.5 eV for both K- and L-edge excitations of small molecules. 450 Hait D., Head-Gordon M.
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
(2020), 11, pp. 775.
Link
Examples of using ROKS/SGM to compute core-excited states are provided in Section 7.9.4. Analytic nuclear gradients (in the excited state) are also available, enabling geometry optimization and molecular dynamics calculations as well, along with finite-difference frequency calculations. Users of the ROKS code are requested to cite Ref.  645 Kowalczyk T. et al.
J. Chem. Phys.
(2013), 138, pp. 164101.
Link
, and in addition Ref.  451 Hait D., Head-Gordon M.
J. Chem. Theory Comput.
(2020), 16, pp. 1699.
Link
if the SGM implementation is employed, as well as Ref.  453 Hait D. et al.
J. Chem. Theory Comput.
(2016), 12, pp. 3353.
Link
for charge-transfer states and Ref.  450 Hait D., Head-Gordon M.
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
(2020), 11, pp. 775.
Link
for application to core excitations.

The chief limitations of ROKS are that it can only describe states with one broken electron pair. It is consequently applicable only to certain excited states of closed-shell systems: all singlet single excitations well-described by a single natural transition orbital (NTO) pair, or higher singlets where only one electron pair is broken in total (like the 1B3g doubly excited state of tetrazine). Fortunately, most charge-transfer and core-excitations do not require more than one broken electron pair, and so this limitation is not a major problem in practice.

To perform an ROKS excited state calculation, simply set the keyword ROKS = TRUE and ensure that UNRESTRICTED = FALSE. An additional keyword ROKS_LEVEL_SHIFT is included to assist in cases of DIIS convergence difficulties with a standard level-shift technique. It is recommended to perform a preliminary ground-state calculation on the system first, and then use the ground-state orbitals to construct the initial guess using SCF_GUESS = READ.

Note:  The $rem variable ROKS_LEVEL_SHIFT is only effective within the original ROKS implementation based on the old SCF engine (GEN_SCFMAN = FALSE). For calculations based on the default SCF engine, one should refer to the STEP method (see Sec. 7.9.5).

ROKS

ROKS
       Controls whether ROKS calculation will be performed.
TYPE:
       LOGICAL
DEFAULT:
       FALSE
OPTIONS:
       FALSE ROKS is not performed. TRUE ROKS will be performed.
RECOMMENDATION:
       Set to TRUE if ROKS calculation is desired. Make sure that UNRESTRICTED is not set to TRUE.

ROKS_LEVEL_SHIFT

ROKS_LEVEL_SHIFT
       Introduce a level shift of N/100 hartree to aid DIIS convergence.
TYPE:
       INTEGER
DEFAULT:
       0
OPTIONS:
       0 No shift N level shift of N/100 hartree.
RECOMMENDATION:
       Use in cases of problematic DIIS convergence.

Example 7.34  RO-PBE0/6-311+G* excited state gradient of formaldehyde, using the ground state orbitals as an initial guess. This used the DIIS based implementation of Ref  645 Kowalczyk T. et al.
J. Chem. Phys.
(2013), 138, pp. 164101.
Link
.

$comment
   ROKS excited state gradient of formaldehyde
   Use orbitals from ground state for initial guess
$end

$rem
   EXCHANGE          pbe0
   BASIS             6-311+G*
   SCF_CONVERGENCE   9
point_group_symmetry False
$end

$molecule
   0 1
   H      -0.940372    0.000000    1.268098
   H       0.940372    0.000000    1.268098
   C       0.000000    0.000000    0.682557
   O       0.000000    0.000000   -0.518752
$end

@@@

$molecule
   read
$end

$rem
   ROKS              true
   UNRESTRICTED      false
   EXCHANGE          pbe0
   BASIS             6-311+G*
   JOBTYPE           force
   SCF_CONVERGENCE   9
point_group_symmetry False
   SCF_GUESS         read
$end