X

Search Results

Searching....

11.5 Effective Fragment Potential Method

11.5.3 Excited-State Calculations with EFP

(September 1, 2024)

Interface of EFP with EOM-CCSD (both via CCMAN and CCMAN2), CIS, CIS(D), TDDFT and ADC has been developed. 1184 Slipchenko L. V.
J. Phys. Chem. A
(2010), 114, pp. 8824.
Link
, 673 Kosenkov D., Slipchenko L. V.
J. Phys. Chem. A
(2011), 115, pp. 392.
Link
, 1147 Sen R., Dreuw A., Faraji S.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
(2019), 21, pp. 3683.
Link

In the excited state calculations, the induced dipoles of the fragments are frozen at their ground state (HF or DFT) values. The resulting excitation energies account for a zero-order response of the polarizable environment. Additionally, perturbative state-specific polarization corrections are computed according to

ΔEpol=12kax,y,z[-(μex,ak-μgr,ak)(Famult,k+Fanuc,k)+(μ~ex,akFex,aai,k-μ~gr,akFgr,aai,k)-(μex,ak-μgr,ak+μ~ex,ak-μ~gr,ak)Fex,aai,k] (11.77)

where Fgrai and Fexai are the fields due to the reference state and excited-state electronic densities, respectively. μgrk and μ~grk are the induced dipole and conjugated induced dipole at the distributed polarizability point k consistent with the reference-state density, while μexk and μ~exk are the induced dipoles corresponding to the excited state density.

The first two terms in Eq. (11.77) provide a difference of the polarization energy of the QM/EFP system in the excited and ground electronic states; the last term is the leading correction to the interaction of the ground-state-optimized induced dipoles with the wave function of the excited state. Thus, the excited states have both direct and indirect polarization contributions. The indirect term comes from the orbital relaxation of the solute in the field due to induced dipoles of the solvent. The direct term given by Eq. (11.77) is the response of the polarizable environment to the change in solute’s electronic density upon excitation. Note that the direct polarization contribution can be very large (tenths of eV) in EOM-IP/EFP since the electronic densities of the neutral and the ionized species are very different.

An important advantage of the perturbative QM/EFP scheme is that it does not compromise multi-state nature of single-referenced excited state calculations and that the electronic wave functions of the target states remain orthogonal to each other since they are obtained with the same (reference-state) field of the polarizable environment. For example, transition properties between these states can be calculated.

In the EOM-CCSD/EFP calculations, the reference-state CCSD equations for the T cluster amplitudes are solved with the HF Hamiltonian modified by the electrostatic and polarization contributions due to the effective fragments, Eq. (11.62). In the coupled-cluster calculation, the induced dipoles of the fragments are frozen at their HF values.

EOM-CC/EFP scheme works with any type of the EOM excitation operator R^k currently supported in Q-Chem, i.e., spin-flipping (SF), excitation energies (EE), ionization potential (IP), electron affinity (EA) (see Section 7.10.17 for details). However, direct polarization correction requires calculation of one-electron density of the excited state, and will be computed only for the methods with implemented one-electron properties.