Approximate EOM-CCSD models with -amplitudes obtained at the MP2 level offer
reduced computational cost compared to the full EOM-CCSD since the
computationally demanding CCSD step is eliminated from the
calculation. Two methods of this type are implemented in Q-Chem. The first is
invoked with the keyword METHOD = EOM-MP2. Its formulation and
implementation follow the original EOM-CCSD(2) approach developed by Stanton
and coworkers.
1205
J. Chem. Phys.
(1995),
103,
pp. 1064.
Link
The second method can be requested with
the METHOD = EOM-MP2T keyword and is similar to EOM-MP2, but it
accounts for the additional terms in that appear because the MP2
-amplitudes do not satisfy the CCSD equations. EOM-MP2 ansatz is
implemented for IP/EA/EE/SF energies, state properties, and interstate
properties (EOM-EOM, but not REF-EOM). EOM-MP2t is available for the IP/EE/EA energy calculations only.
These are very light-weight EOM methods in which the EOM problem is solved in
the singles block and the effect of doubles is evaluated perturbatively. The
is evaluated by using either CCSD or MP2 amplitudes, just as in the
regular EOM calculations. The EOM-MP2-S(D) method, which is similar in level
of correlation treatment to SOS-CIS(D), is particularly fast. These methods are
implemented for IP and EE states. For valence states, the
errors for absolute ionization or excitation energies against regular EOM-CCSD
are about 0.4 eV and appear to be systematically blue-shifted; the EOM-EOM
energy gaps look better. The calculations are set as in regular EOM-EE/IP, but
using METHOD = EOM-CCSD-SD(D) or METHOD = EOM-MP2-SD(D).
State properties and EOM-EOM transition properties can be computed using these
methods (reference-EOM properties are not yet implemented). These methods are designed
for treating core-level states.
1115
J. Chem. Phys.
(2017),
147,
pp. 014107.
Link
Note: These methods are still in the experimental stage.