The theory of resonance Raman spectroscopy is fully described by the Kramers-Heisenberg-Dirac dispersion formalism based on the Raman polarizability tensor
611
J. Phys. Chem. A
(2008),
112,
pp. 11975.
Link
(10.28) |
between initial state and final state . Here, and are the frequencies of the laser (incident photon) and of the scattered photon, respectively. Eq. (10.28) is inconvenient due to the sum over intermediate states (vibrational levels on all accessible
electronic states), and the usual procedure is to expand the static molecular polarizability as a Taylor series in the normal coordinates,
35
J. Chem. Phys.
(1961),
34,
pp. 1476.
Link
which allows the Raman intensity to be decomposed into Franck–Condon (or “-term”) contributions and
coordinate-dependent Herzberg–Teller (“”- and “”-term) contributions.
35
J. Chem. Phys.
(1961),
34,
pp. 1476.
Link
,
611
J. Phys. Chem. A
(2008),
112,
pp. 11975.
Link
Nevertheless, each term contains sums over intermediate vibrational states and becomes difficult to evaluate for large
molecules with numerous vibrational modes.
As such, in most cases only the lowest-lying Raman-active excited electronic state
is considered in computing the RR spectrum. In principle one should consider the effects of Duschinsky rotation,
1124
J. Chem. Phys.
(1964),
41,
pp. 3453.
Link
i.e.,
the fact that the normal modes are different in each electronic state. Neglecting this effect for simplicity and thus using
ground-state normal modes only, one arrives at the “independent-mode, displaced harmonic oscillator” (IMDHO) model,
970
J. Chem. Phys.
(2007),
127,
pp. 164319.
Link
in which resonant enhancements to the vibrational intensities (for modes 1 and 2, say)
are expressed as ratios
490
J. Phys. Chem.
(1982),
86,
pp. 1822.
Link
,
870
Chem. Rev.
(1996),
96,
pp. 911.
Link
,
271
J. Phys. Chem. B
(2019),
123,
pp. 8074.
Link
(10.29) |
In this equation, and represent the ground-state vibrational frequencies for normal modes and and is the electronic excitation energy. The first equality in Eq. (10.29), written as an approximation here, is exact within the IMDHO model. The quantity
(10.30) |
evaluated at the ground-state geometry (), is the slope of the excited-state potential energy surface along mode . This leads to the second equality in Eq. (10.29).
The time-dependent picture provides means to derive this expression.
490
J. Phys. Chem.
(1982),
86,
pp. 1822.
Link
In this approach,
the requisite polarizability tensor elements involving different electronic states are expressed as the Fourier transformation of the
time-evolving overlap between initial- and final-state electronic wave functions:
(10.31) |
Here, “NRT” indicates the non-resonant terms that are neglected in RR spectroscopy. Large molecules likely spend no more
than 10–20 fs in the Franck-Condon region and the overlap integral is likely only significant on that timescale.
490
J. Phys. Chem.
(1982),
86,
pp. 1822.
Link
,
870
Chem. Rev.
(1996),
96,
pp. 911.
Link
,
271
J. Phys. Chem. B
(2019),
123,
pp. 8074.
Link
Within a model that considers only two electronic states, the RR intensity that one obtains is
(10.32) |
where is the reduced mass of the th normal mode.
Assuming identical force constants for in both the ground and excited electronic state, one obtains a linear transformation between the displacement of the equilibrium position of this mode, expressed in normal coordinates, and the displacements expressed in Cartesian coordinates:
(10.33) |
In matrix form this is
(10.34) |
where is the eigenvalues of mass-weighted Hessian matrix, M defines the matrix of atomic masses and is the energy gradient in Cartesian coordinate Raman intensities are related to the dimensionless displacements
(10.35) |
Setting JOBTYPE = RRAMAN invokes the calculation of resonance Raman intensities.
RR_NO_NORMALISE
RR_NO_NORMALISE
Controls whether frequency job calculates resonance Raman intensities
TYPE:
LOGICAL
DEFAULT:
False
OPTIONS:
False
Normalize RR intensities
True
Do not normalize RR intensities
RECOMMENDATION:
False
$molecule 0 1 C 1.8288506578 -0.1219336002 0.0000000000 C 0.6155951063 0.3987918905 0.0000000000 C -0.6155955606 -0.3987931260 0.0000000000 C -1.8288502653 0.1219348794 0.0000000000 H 2.7085214046 0.4909328271 0.0000000000 H 1.9881851899 -1.1843222290 0.0000000000 H 0.4885913610 1.4671254626 0.0000000000 H -0.4885933454 -1.4671268234 0.0000000000 H -1.9881816088 1.1843239478 0.0000000000 H -2.7085226822 -0.4909289672 0.0000000000 $end $rem JOBTYPE RRAMAN METHOD hf BASIS 3-21G CIS_N_ROOTS 1 CIS_STATE_DERIVATIVE 1 $end