In certain situations, even the attachment/detachment densities may be
difficult to analyze. An important class of examples are systems with multiple
chromophores, which may support exciton states consisting of linear
combinations of localized excitations. For such states, both the attachment
and the detachment density are highly delocalized and occupy basically the same
region of space.
681
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(2009),
131,
pp. 124115.
Link
Lack of phase information makes the
attachment/detachment densities difficult to analyze, while strong mixing
of the canonical MOs means that excitonic states are also difficult to
characterize in terms of MOs.
Analysis of these and other excited states is greatly simplified by
constructing Natural Transition Orbitals (NTOs) for the excited states.
(The basic idea behind NTOs is rather old
782
Theor. Exp. Chem.
(1976),
10,
pp. 354.
Link
and has been
rediscovered several times;
820
J. Chem. Phys.
(2003),
118,
pp. 4775.
Link
,
831
Chem. Phys. Lett.
(2007),
437,
pp. 284.
Link
these orbitals were
later shown to be equivalent to CIS natural orbitals.
1200
Chem. Phys. Lett.
(2007),
439,
pp. 393.
Link
) Let
denote the transition density matrix from an excited-state
calculation. The dimension of this matrix is , where and
denote the number of occupied and virtual MOs, respectively. The NTOs are
defined by transformations and obtained by singular
value decomposition (SVD) of the matrix , i.e.,
831
Chem. Phys. Lett.
(2007),
437,
pp. 284.
Link
(7.139) |
The matrices and are unitary and is
diagonal, with the latter containing at most non-zero elements. The matrix
is a unitary transformation from the canonical occupied MOs to a
set of NTOs that together represent the “hole” orbital that is left by the
excited electron, while transforms the canonical virtual MOs into
a set of NTOs representing the excited electron. (Equivalently, the “holes”
are the eigenvectors of the matrix and the
particles are eigenvectors of the matrix
.
820
J. Chem. Phys.
(2003),
118,
pp. 4775.
Link
) These “hole” and
“particle” NTOs come in pairs, and their relative importance in describing
the excitation is governed by the diagonal elements of , which
are excitation amplitudes in the NTO basis. By virtue of the SVD in
Eq. (7.139), any excited state may be represented using at most
excitation amplitudes and corresponding hole/particle NTO pairs. (The‘
discussion here assumes that , which is typically the case except
possibly in minimal basis sets. Although it is possible to use the transpose
of Eq. (7.139) to obtain NTOs when , this has not been
implemented in Q-Chem due to its limited domain of applicability.)
The SVD generalizes the concept of matrix diagonalization to the case of rectangular matrices, and therefore reduces as much as possible the number of non-zero outer products needed for an exact representation of . In this sense, the NTOs represent the best possible particle/hole picture of an excited state. The detachment density is recovered as the sum of the squares of the “hole” NTOs, while the attachment density is precisely the sum of the squares of the “particle” NTOs. Unlike the attachment/detachment densities, however, NTOs preserve phase information, which can be very helpful in characterizing the diabatic character (e.g., or ) of excited states in complex systems. In the limit that there is only one significant pair of NTOs, the squares of these two orbitals ( and ) are precisely equivalent to the detachment and attachment densities that were introduced in Section 7.15.2. Even when there is more than one significant NTO amplitude, the NTOs still represent a significant compression of information, as compared to the canonical MO basis.
NTOs are available within Q-Chem for CIS, RPA, TDDFT, ADC, and EOM-CC methods. For the correlated wave functions (EOM-CC and ADC) and for SF-DFT, they can be computed using libwfa module. The simplest way to visualize the NTOs is to generate them in a format suitable for viewing with the freely-available MolDen or MacMolPlt programs, as described in Chapter 10.